Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 10:08
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What does the Bible say about the Antichrist? How will we know when he arrives on the scene?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
The Gears of War Reloaded beta is here, what you need to know and how to play - Windows Central
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Report: Steelers expect to have a deal with T.J. Watt by the start of the season - NBC Sports
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How can AI help interior designers?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
What does the stink of the skunk look like? Why would it be dangerous?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Bessent Emerging as a Contender to Succeed Fed’s Powell - Bloomberg
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.